http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/111909_ReidBill.pdf
The link to the full bill set for debate... I have a headache now from starting to read it. Below is Rep. Greg Walden's comments on 11/09/09:
“Tonight, the U.S. House of Representatives had a choice of two healthcare reform plans. I voted for healthcare reform that would reduce the cost of health insurance premiums by 10 percent, cut the federal deficit by $68 billion, and make insurance more accessible to millions of Americans. Unfortunately, that’s not the plan that passed.
“As a small business owner for more than 21 years, I know what it’s like to pay the bills and sign the front side of a paycheck. Independent analysts estimate that the $730 billion in new taxes on Americans families and small businesses in the bill that passed today will result in the loss of 5.5 million American jobs. There’s even an unthinkable new tax on items like pacemakers, artificial hips, and stints.
“The country cannot afford a new $1.3 trillion government program that creates 111 new bureaucracies, especially when nationwide unemployment is at its highest level in 26 years. Just this year, Washington, D.C. has launched unprecedented national takeovers of the auto industry, the energy industry, and now the healthcare of every American.
“The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the cost of a family premium under the government takeover that passed today will be $15,000 in 2016. The Republican alternative that I voted for tonight would reduce that cost to $10,000 in 2016.
“I served on a hospital board for many years and strongly believe that this country is in need of healthcare reform. But that reform should not be borne on the backs of seniors in the form of over $500 million in cuts to Medicare Advantage in Oregon’s Second District, which would impact the healthcare of 38,000 seniors in central, southern, and eastern Oregon. Americans deserve a patient-centered approach to healthcare, not a government plan that threatens to force you off the care you enjoy right now with a more expensive plan.
“We can do better with a targeted approach that tackles the biggest problems, and that’s what I voted for. We can lower the cost of premiums and expand access by giving employers the ability to group together for stronger bargaining with health insurance companies, just like corporations and unions do right now. We can allow insurance to be purchased across state lines, giving families and businesses much more choice and competition to bring down the cost of health insurance. And we can protect Medicare and the seniors who rely on it and ensure that no one is denied access to healthcare because pre-existing conditions. The Republican plan I voted for would have done all of that.
“Finally, I am strongly disappointed that rural America was left behind in this bill. Two amendments I proposed in the Energy and Commerce Committee to ensure a voice for rural America on government healthcare committees were stripped behind closed doors, with no explanation. That’s just plain wrong, and it speaks to why the American people are so frustrated with the broken system of government in Washington, D.C.”
Monday, November 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Susan G. Koman foundation issued a press release following a Government "Task Force" recomendation:
ReplyDelete"Mammography is by far the best screening method, and until a better one is developed the current recommendations for breast cancer screening should not change.
ObamaCare hasn't even passed the Senate yet, and already this task force seems to be implementing cost cutting measures in anticipation of the government's increased financial stake in the health care of millions of Americans. And if this doesn't concern you, keep in mind that Pelosi's health care bill that just passed the House is chock full of new government health care task forces that will issue all manner of new recommendations, the vast majority of which will probably be that citizens should postpone screenings for various cancers, illnesses, and disorders.
And President Obama said no one should come between you and your doctor. What he meant is that no one should come between you and your doctor - except a government health care task force."
Ok...where did the quote from the Susan G. Koman foundation come from. I can't find it anywhere. Or, did someone forget to close quotes sooner? I'm doubting the organization made any statement about ObamaCare.
ReplyDeleteBut, maybe I'm wrong. Care to share the link?
Well, I just heated up some crow in the microwave and took a bite...
ReplyDeleteI missed the end quote and where commentary began in an op-ed article after the press release hyperlink. My bad! Good catch Tom... I had to back track to even see where I found the link(s) to begin with. Below is the link to the Susan G. Koman Foundation website.
http://ww5.komen.org/KomenNewsArticle.aspx?id=6442451487
Ok, pal...not to be too nit-picky, but none of what you wrote in quotes exists in that article...at least, I can't find it. In fact, I thought that article was pretty informative and helpful and that it was not really critical of "Obamacare" nor with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)findings.
ReplyDeleteI think this is the important quote;
"Our real focus, however, should be on the fact that one-third of the women who qualify for screening under today’s guidelines are not being screened due to lack of access, education or awareness."
My first thought when I heard about the new mammogram recommendations was "Is my insurance company going to change how often women can get mammograms to every other year and not until age 50?"
ReplyDeleteSo, my questions about this are:
1) What is the evidence that 'Obamacare' is going to limit mammograms based on the new research? After all, the American Cancer Society isn't going by those guidelines.
2) If there is no 'Obamacare', are the allowances going to change, i.e., are insurance companies going to slash mammograms to 'save
costs' (read: make more profits)?
Insurance companies already limit care and as Tom pointed out, those who aren't insured are REALLY limited!
You know I really don't care anymore. I say lets pull out all the stops. Lets enact this legislation and all others like it. If there's an entitlement program out there, lets get it done. If we can think of another program to start lets do that too!
ReplyDeleteScrew it, I am tired of fighting, and I can use something for nothing.
I want to know where do I go to sign up for my "free" health care? I don't want to keep paying for my current plan so I'd like to get some of the "free" one. That way I can just pay once. My tax money can pay for it rather than my taxes and a premium on top of it...
I also want to get some help paying my mortgage, my heat bill, (When it skyrockets) food bill, and where can I get free college for my kids?
Anything else I can get let me know, huh...
Finally! Welcome aboard, Comrade.
ReplyDeleteGod, I love Sarcasm! :)
ReplyDeleteYes, I'm posting Alec Baldwin. Durka Durka.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/alec-baldwin/the-republican-way-keepin_b_369123.html